Army Uses White Phosphorus in Iraq - Page 4 - United Bimmer Community

**bmwcrazy** · 11-22-2005, 08:33 AM

The source is one of the largest news organizations in Italy. They were in Falluja before the seige and didnt leave until it was over.

**xsperf** · 11-22-2005, 08:21 PM

see hoppy, just becuase you dont know what the source is, you decide to ignore it, meaning that you will only listen to the US media, which is definetely biased, they may not lie, but then again they dont have to show anti-us stuff

Storamin · 11-23-2005, 07:28 AM

big bunch of pussies.

you use what you can to kill the enemy. make the other bastard die for his beliefs before he gets you.

it doesn't matter how you die, it's not long before you're dead.

DEATH2000 · 11-23-2005, 10:31 AM

^^ to add to what storamin said:

Kill or be killed. Thats how war works.

**xsperf** · 11-23-2005, 10:54 AM

yes storamin, should i mention mustard gas AGAIN? why do you think it was banned from WWII? because the USA made such a big fuss about it? its chemical warfare, no matter how bad war is, there are still some rules

DEATH2000 · 11-23-2005, 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xsperf

yes storamin, should i mention mustard gas AGAIN? why do you think it was banned from WWII? because the USA made such a big fuss about it? its chemical warfare, no matter how bad war is, there are still some rules

Mustard gas was never "banned" from the war. Hitler never allowed the us of it after he was temporarily blinded and nearly killed by it during the first world war. Because of that he never authorized the use of it, not the US bieng pussy's about it.

**xsperf** · 11-23-2005, 11:41 AM

ok death, can you provide me with a source, b/c i believe your are desperately wrong, or if i am wrong i will stand corrected

**xsperf** · 11-23-2005, 11:45 AM

http://historynet.com/wwii/blluftwaf...ic/index1.html

right there. it says that even though he was gassed, he was stockpiling it and was using them anyway, while, "American President Franklin D. Roosevelt issued a policy statement condemning the use of gas by any civilized nation"

ok, so now STFU about this mustard gas wasnt used b/c ur wrong

DEATH2000 · 11-23-2005, 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xsperf

http://historynet.com/wwii/blluftwaf...ic/index1.html

right there. it says that even though he was gassed, he was stockpiling it and was using them anyway, while, "American President Franklin D. Roosevelt issued a policy statement condemning the use of gas by any civilized nation"

ok, so now STFU about this mustard gas wasnt used b/c ur wrong

Read this:

Quote:

Hitler, it was said, was not a great advocate of chemical warfare, perhaps because the Führer himself had been gassed during World War I. He was, however, ruthless and might be persuaded to use gas if he believed it would redress the strategic balance in his favor. Intelligence reports [B]suggested{/B] that the Germans were stocking chemical weapons, including a new chemical agent called Tabun

He might have been persuaded. he never gacve his permission to use it in combat. Intelligence reports only suggested that he was stock piling chemical weapons. And Tabun is not musatrd gas, its a differnt chemical agent.

Quote:

American President Franklin D. Roosevelt issued a policy statement condemning the use of gas by any civilized nation, but he pledged that the United States would reply in kind if the enemy dared to use such weapons first. John Harvey was selected to convey a shipment of poison gas to Italy to be held in reserve should such a situation occur.

Roosevelt said they would condemm a nation for using it. And if Germany used it first then they would use it in retailaition.

Find me a case were it was used. Find me an article were it specifically says Germany sued mustard gas in combat.

**xsperf** · 11-23-2005, 12:13 PM

yes, the US condemns the use of it! its a chemical weapon, and now they are using a chemical weapon agaisnt iraq, as far as im concerned, iraq didnt use a chemical weapon FIRST

**Hoppy** · 11-23-2005, 12:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xsperf

see hoppy, just becuase you dont know what the source is, you decide to ignore it, meaning that you will only listen to the US media, which is definetely biased, they may not lie, but then again they dont have to show anti-us stuff

no i asked for a time slot of the movie that deals with WP. not 5 minutes about vietnam. an anoying narator accent, and iraqis speaking in broken english. im willing to watch it, but im not watching 27 minutes of it.

no ones told me where in the video the WP stuff is yet.

**xsperf** · 11-23-2005, 12:16 PM

ok, i stand corrected, however it was used in WWI by hitlor against the french, and the british, and i believe a few other nations, ok!

**xsperf** · 11-23-2005, 12:18 PM

oh and here is the article

http://www.firstworldwar.com/weaponry/gas.htm

and hoppy, b/c the narrator has an accent, that means its not US media, which means its not as bias as US media is, so just b/c the narrator has an accent you dont want to listen to it?

DEATH2000 · 11-23-2005, 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xsperf

ok, i stand corrected, however it was used in WWI by hitlor against the french, and the british, and i believe a few other nations, ok!

Hitler was only a private during WWI. And yes Germany did use it against allied troops. The Bristish retailied by using it as well.

**xsperf** · 11-23-2005, 12:57 PM

hitlor was a private, ok i think you need to start citing your sources

and whats your point, british retaliated by using it as well? source please

oh and regardless of who used it, it is chemical warfare and the US did condemn the use of it, now they are using it, so your post still yeild no point