You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Geek ChatAsk computer questions or just engage in general geek talk on here
I am going to get XP Pro, and I think a lite version or something, I forgot what my friend said.
There is also a firmware hack to burn dvds at max speed, taking away the regulation
^^^It just denotes a CPU architecture originally developed by Intel. Most PC's, whether Intel or AMD equipped, are x86. The name comes from the earlier processors which model numbers ended in "86" (as in 386, 486, etc.). They employ CISC design, as opposed to the RISC design typical in Macs. (It has to do with how the processor executes instructions/commands.) But both are so far advanced nowadays that there isn't a whole lot of real world difference between them. Nothing the average person needs to know, but you can Google the terms if you really wanna get geeky.
Nice setup for a rig, by the way. IMHO, 2 things I would keep an eye on: The PSU has gotten a couple of iffy reviews; I would go with Antec or Enermax if it gets flaky. And the heatsinks provided with AMD processors are crap if you'll be doing a lot of cpu intensive work; you may want to change that out in the future
User not setup in Rate My Car. Click here to set it up.
Your Ride: e36
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dudesky
^^^It just denotes a CPU architecture originally developed by Intel. Most PC's, whether Intel or AMD equipped, are x86. The name comes from the earlier processors which model numbers ended in "86" (as in 386, 486, etc.). They employ CISC design, as opposed to the RISC design typical in Macs. (It has to do with how the processor executes instructions/commands.) But both are so far advanced nowadays that there isn't a whole lot of real world difference between them. Nothing the average person needs to know, but you can Google the terms if you really wanna get geeky.
Nice setup for a rig, by the way. IMHO, 2 things I would keep an eye on: The PSU has gotten a couple of iffy reviews; I would go with Antec or Enermax if it gets flaky. And the heatsinks provided with AMD processors are crap if you'll be doing a lot of cpu intensive work; you may want to change that out in the future
I think it should be fine. A lot of people are idiots... the first negative review was:
"Pros: It worked-for about two months...
Cons: Came with my case. Started to cause my system to reboot every 5 minuets. Also there is no fan on the bottom to suck heat out of case -gets verry hot and is noisier than hell!
Other Thoughts: Want to screw up a 4000 dollar dream machine! buy this one!"
Unless AMD's design has changed recently, the heatsinks they provide are all aluminum. Better aftermarket sinks employ either all copper construction or a copper slug where it contacts the cpu core, which equates to better heat transfer and dissipation. And the fans they use are typically innefficient and break down easily. This is especially critical if you're planning to overclock the cpu. Even so, I still say AMD over Intel FTW!
User not setup in Rate My Car. Click here to set it up.
Your Ride: 94 bmw 325i, 97 vw golf
Brien my heatsink is fine for my AMD processor when I built my comp around 2 years ago. And I used to play games non-stop, and even overclock it sometimes.
Just keep an eye on temp, if the bios allows it set a temp limit. 80C should be the absolute max I would let it get to. The AMD fans are a bit on the cheap side but I havn't had one not work out of the box, they do break easily and may not last (YMMV). A case fan is recommended, just watch your airflow. You don't want to add fans which couteract each other.
Power supplies, I always hear a lot of crap about power supplies. For a while there seemed to be no end to power supplie failures. It was like 1 in 3 would fail. But they have gotten better. They fail far less than they used to. I never noticed a great difference in power supply quality with different brands. In fact my last 2 power supply failures were enermax. Best advice, if it works and is stable use it, if not replace it.
Hard drive. I would have gone with serial ata. It does make a difference. Although the barracuda is a good drive.
The Nec 3550 is a good drive. I have had my best success with nec drive. The only time I end up replacing them is when I upgrade. Be careful with firmware hacks, they are the fastest way to turn a good burner into a lump of crap.
All in all I think you will probably be quite happy with your setup.