You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
E36General discussion and technical help for (E36) 1992-1999 3 series cars. 318, 323, 325, 328.
User not setup in Rate My Car. Click here to set it up.
Your Ride: e36
non vanos worth it?
I might take a look at a 325 (1992). I dont think that 92 had vanos, my question is, should i stay away? is not having vanos going to make a big difference?
not having the vanos does suck.. it's a noticable difference in power imo. Before I bought mine, I was looking at a 92 325i and it was nothing compared to the 95 I tes drove and bought...
Hmmm.. I would say that out of the hole Vanos is better. Once you are in second gear though the power band is all wrong. I get all of my power from 3500-7000 RPM and everytime I change gears I am right back in the meat of that power band.
Vanos cars kind of lose breath after 5000 RPM.. so you shift sooner putting you at a lower RPM. The non-vanos cars where really popular on the race track. Since 1st gear is almost never used.
Also the 92 was the lightest E36 (Besides the LTW)