You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
E36General discussion and technical help for (E36) 1992-1999 3 series cars. 318, 323, 325, 328.
I think the fuel consumption for the M42 and the M44 are pretty much the same (I've had both)...if it's the 1895cc M43 you're talking about, I would imagine as a more modern engine, it'll probably return a better mpg. Can't imagine by much though...way lower bhp too...I think it's only about 115 -120bhp as opposed to the M42/M44's 140bhp.
User not setup in Rate My Car. Click here to set it up.
Your Ride: e36
Well, the sound of engine (m44) was different from m50, and this is the most what i disliked in that, i am used to listen to my m50, and i realised that i dont wonna change that! its no matter for me,more cilinders or bigger the engine...coz usually im not driving very fast,thats why i was thinking that m44 would be perfect, but...