Originally Posted by Spieluhr
Chrisdoesntknow you make very good points.
and hoppy. you say that gays are unnatural because they cannot reproduce w/o the help of technology. ok, valid point. but what about men and women who are sterile, what about men and women who never even get to the age where they can reproduce due to a fatal illness? are they not welcome to be "natural" in the world, are men and women who cannot successfully reproduce not allowed to marry?
and i can see your point of the church has to decide if it will marry gay couples, but that's where church and state get mixed together and i think that is a big mistake.
i didnt say they shouldnt be here. but they do fail are the goal of life. procreation. to me" marriage" is a relegious thing. should gays couples get the same tax breaks and the rest of the stuff straights gets. yes, not because i believe in gays rights but because i feel its the nice thing to do.
for the sterile people. last time i checked natural sterility isnt taht common. its introduced by exposure to chemicals, radiation, and inbreeding. and trying and failing i still feel is better then being gay.
asfor people who die before being sexualy active... well they died didnt they? thats a good thing from an evolutionary stand point. there is less chance to pass on thier defective genes. also look at it from a ratio.
100% gays= no kids .01%? straights( those sterile)= no kids....
humans today have basicly slowed evolution. the weak no longer die off because medicine keeps them alive. unfavorable genes are not removed from the gene pool because of technology. evolution is brought about by random combineing of genes during conception. not mutation. more later. i got to go to class for final.